<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/templates/default/atom.css" type="text/css" ?>

<feed 
   xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
   xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
   xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
   xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
   xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
   xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
    <link href="http://none.of-the-above.com/feeds/atom.xml" rel="self" title="None of the Above" type="application/atom+xml" />
    <link href="http://none.of-the-above.com/"                        rel="alternate"    title="None of the Above" type="text/html" />
    <link href="http://none.of-the-above.com/rss.php?version=2.0"     rel="alternate"    title="None of the Above" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <title type="html">None of the Above</title>
    <subtitle type="html">Choose the option that best describes you.</subtitle>
    <icon>http://none.of-the-above.com/templates/default/img/s9y_banner_small.png</icon>
    <id>http://none.of-the-above.com/</id>
    <updated>2009-04-07T13:45:23Z</updated>
    <generator uri="http://www.s9y.org/" version="1.4">Serendipity 1.4 - http://www.s9y.org/</generator>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>

    <entry>
        <link href="http://none.of-the-above.com/archives/283-echo-loop.html" rel="alternate" title="echo loop" />
        <author>
            <name>ra</name>
                    </author>
    
        <published>2009-04-12T13:45:00Z</published>
        <updated>2009-04-07T13:45:23Z</updated>
        <wfw:comment>http://none.of-the-above.com/wfwcomment.php?cid=283</wfw:comment>
    
        <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
        <wfw:commentRss>http://none.of-the-above.com/rss.php?version=atom1.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=283</wfw:commentRss>
    
    
        <id>http://none.of-the-above.com/archives/283-guid.html</id>
        <title type="html">echo loop</title>
        <content type="xhtml" xml:base="http://none.of-the-above.com/">
            <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                If you're lucky enough to be able to call two different Asterisk servers from one phone, a really fun thing to do is to call the echo test on one Asterisk server, then conference in a new call to the echo test on a different Asterisk server, creating an echo loop.<br />
<br />
The IP phone on my desk is connected to two Asterisk servers and it made my day when I realized I could do this. 
            </div>
        </content>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <link href="http://none.of-the-above.com/archives/282-laptop-unexistium.html" rel="alternate" title="laptop unexistium" />
        <author>
            <name>ra</name>
                    </author>
    
        <published>2009-04-09T21:18:00Z</published>
        <updated>2009-04-11T00:11:39Z</updated>
        <wfw:comment>http://none.of-the-above.com/wfwcomment.php?cid=282</wfw:comment>
    
        <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
        <wfw:commentRss>http://none.of-the-above.com/rss.php?version=atom1.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=282</wfw:commentRss>
    
    
        <id>http://none.of-the-above.com/archives/282-guid.html</id>
        <title type="html">laptop unexistium</title>
        <content type="xhtml" xml:base="http://none.of-the-above.com/">
            <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                I've been shopping for a new laptop and it's becoming a thoroughly frustrating experience.<br />
<br />
I know what I want... but NO one makes it. I'm considering either purchasing a 15" laptop that would be my primary workstation at home and away, or buying a 13" small, convenient, portable machine that I would use mostly on the go. I would even go for a 14" if I could only find one with the right features, even though it's not what I really want.<br />
<br />
This is my requirements list for each size laptop:<br />
<br />
15" LED backlit WUXGA (1920x1200) screen<br />
Intel Core 2 Duo 2.4+Ghz<br />
DDR3 ram<br />
<br />
14" LED backlit WSXGA+ (1680x1050) screen<br />
Intel Core 2 Duo 2.2+Ghz<br />
DDR3 ram<br />
<br />
13" LED backlit WXGA+ (1440x900) screen<br />
Intel Core 2 Duo 2.0+Ghz<br />
DDR3 ram<br />
<br />
<br />
I don't think I'm really being that picky. My budget is at most about $2500 for my new laptop, so I am willing to pay for something that meets my criteria. Plus there are all kinds of other components not listed on which I'm willing to be flexible. Alas every notebook on the market falls short. I don't know what to do, so for now I'm just waiting for a new product to come along and impress me. 
            </div>
        </content>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <link href="http://none.of-the-above.com/archives/279-video-killed.html" rel="alternate" title="video killed" />
        <author>
            <name>ra</name>
                    </author>
    
        <published>2009-03-18T00:38:00Z</published>
        <updated>2009-03-18T03:10:13Z</updated>
        <wfw:comment>http://none.of-the-above.com/wfwcomment.php?cid=279</wfw:comment>
    
        <slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
        <wfw:commentRss>http://none.of-the-above.com/rss.php?version=atom1.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=279</wfw:commentRss>
    
    
        <id>http://none.of-the-above.com/archives/279-guid.html</id>
        <title type="html">video killed</title>
        <content type="xhtml" xml:base="http://none.of-the-above.com/">
            <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                <a class='serendipity_image_link' href='http://none.of-the-above.com/uploads/media/pos.jpg'><!-- s9ymdb:53 --><img class="serendipity_image_right" width="64" height="110" style="float: right; border: 0px; padding-left: 5px; padding-right: 5px;" src="http://none.of-the-above.com/uploads/media/pos.serendipityThumb.jpg" alt="" /></a>...the radio star. Yeah. Anyway, I have a linksys WVC54GCA Network/IP camera that I've been playing around with. This camera is convenient because it's wireless so I can put it almost anywhere I want... or I could if the fucking piece of shit didn't lose it's wireless connection every ~24 hours and require a reset to get back online. So I have to run cat5 to the fucker instead. And it doesn't support PoE. Annoying, but it seems to work OK with power and UTP stuck up it's ass. Whatever. Remind me not to buy linksys again.<br />
<br />
I've also been playing around with <a href="http://www.zoneminder.com/">ZoneMinder</a> and trying to get it grabbing video from the camera. That worked fine at 320x240 (jpeg) but not at 640x480 (jpeg or mjpeg). I finally figured out that it was a memory allocation problem. Even though I had followed a tip I found somewhere on upping the limit to 134217728, apparently that wasn't enough to grab high res from the camera. Finally I found <a href="http://www.zoneminder.com/wiki/index.php/FAQ#What_does_a_.27Can.27t_shmget:_Invalid_argument.27_error_in_my_logs_mean.3F_and_my_cameras_won.27t_display_video_at_higher_resolutions.">this tip</a> and I raised the limit to 268424446. Now it works fine at 640x480.<br />
<br />
The most difficult part of the process was finding the URL's for grabbing video/stills directly. Through googling and experimentation this is what I came up with:<br />
<br />
Linksys WVC54GCA - firmware 1.00r24<br />
<br />
320x240 jpeg:<br />
http://camera_ip_address/img/snapshot.cgi <br />
<br />
640x480 jpeg:<br />
http://camera_ip_address/img/snapshot.cgi?a<br />
(I first tried ?res=640x480, which worked, but then I discovered that passing any argument at all gives you the larger jpeg)<br />
<br />
640x480 mjpeg:<br />
http://camera_ip_address/img/mjpeg.jpg<br />
http://camera_ip_address/img/mjpeg.cgi<br />
http://camera_ip_address/img/video.mjpeg<br />
(I don't know whether there is any difference between these. I didn't notice any.)<br />
<br />
640x680 mpeg:<br />
http://camera_ip_address/img/video.asf<br />
(VLC 0.9.4 plays this perfectly, including audio) 
            </div>
        </content>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <link href="http://none.of-the-above.com/archives/278-secret-downtime.html" rel="alternate" title="secret downtime" />
        <author>
            <name>ra</name>
                    </author>
    
        <published>2009-03-10T00:44:00Z</published>
        <updated>2009-03-10T13:52:28Z</updated>
        <wfw:comment>http://none.of-the-above.com/wfwcomment.php?cid=278</wfw:comment>
    
        <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
        <wfw:commentRss>http://none.of-the-above.com/rss.php?version=atom1.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=278</wfw:commentRss>
    
    
        <id>http://none.of-the-above.com/archives/278-guid.html</id>
        <title type="html">secret downtime</title>
        <content type="xhtml" xml:base="http://none.of-the-above.com/">
            <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                Why is unannounced scheduled maintenance so ridiculously fucking common these days?<br />
<br />
I tried to login to Citibank's website just now to pay my bill. No go. I get some random "General Error" with an even more vague definition of what is (or isn't) happening when I try to log in. Last time something like this happened I told them about it after the fact and they denied that there had been any problem, so this time I called them up right away. I'm told that they <strong>might</strong> be doing scheduled maintenance until 03:00, but they don't know whether they are doing maintenance tonight or not. OK...... They can however confirm that <em>if</em> they are indeed doing maintenance, I will not be able to login until it is complete. Hmmm... homepage says nothing about maintenance, neither does the error message. Finally, they suggest I try to reset my password. If there is a chance you're doing maintenance now, is this really an ideal time to fuck around with resetting my password?? Morons.<br />
<br />
Dear Citibank: I made the following just for you. Please feel free to copy and paste it to the top of your website as appropriate:<br />
<blockquote>------------<br />
WE'RE BUSY DOING PREVENTATIVE DEVASTATION RIGHT NOW. FEEL FREE TO RESET YOUR PASSWORD IF YOU CAN'T LOGIN, BUT KEEP IN MIND THAT IT'S NOT GOING TO FUCKING WORK AT ALL UNTIL WE'RE DONE.<br />
<br />
LOVE,<br />
CITIBANK<br />
------------</blockquote> 
            </div>
        </content>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <link href="http://none.of-the-above.com/archives/276-openvpn-routing.html" rel="alternate" title="openvpn routing" />
        <author>
            <name>ra</name>
                    </author>
    
        <published>2009-02-16T12:21:17Z</published>
        <updated>2009-02-16T13:31:00Z</updated>
        <wfw:comment>http://none.of-the-above.com/wfwcomment.php?cid=276</wfw:comment>
    
        <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
        <wfw:commentRss>http://none.of-the-above.com/rss.php?version=atom1.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=276</wfw:commentRss>
    
    
        <id>http://none.of-the-above.com/archives/276-guid.html</id>
        <title type="html">openvpn routing</title>
        <content type="xhtml" xml:base="http://none.of-the-above.com/">
            <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                I've recently started using OpenVPN's subnet topology. This requires OpenVPN 2.1 on both ends of the tunnel, but allows for one IP per client instead of a /30 block and works on all platforms, unlike the old (and now depricated) p2p topology.<br />
<br />
I quickly ran into a snag with the subnet topology, however. The routes in my server-side OpenVPN config file no longer got created when OpenVPN was started, so networks behind connecting clients were unrouteable. I checked the logs and found the following messages from when OpenVPN started:<br />
<blockquote>OpenVPN ROUTE: OpenVPN needs a gateway parameter for a --route option and no default was specified by either --route-gateway or --ifconfig options<br />
OpenVPN ROUTE: failed to parse/resolve route for host/network ...</blockquote><br />
<br />
If I changed back to topology net30, everything worked fine with the config as is, so the problem was definitely specific to the subnet topology. Googling led me to several unanswered queries and finally one solution:<br />
<a href="http://openvpn.net/archive/openvpn-users/2007-08/msg00152.html">http://openvpn.net/archive/openvpn-users/2007-08/msg00152.html</a><br />
<br />
As the errors above indicate, you need to specify a gateway in the route command in the OpenVPN config file when using the subnet topology. But what should the gateway be? The person in the linked post chooses the obvious solution, the VPN IP of the client behind which the remote network resides. That works, but what if I don't have a specific IP set for that client? From the system routing table you really only have to get traffic destined for the remote network routed to the VPN adapter, because OpenVPN has it's own routing table and will take care of the rest. Therefore, simply using the VPN IP of the OpenVPN server as the gateway accomplishes this, and seems to me to be the best solution.<br />
<br />
OpenVPN server config snippet:<br />
<blockquote><br />
# Configure server mode and supply a VPN subnet<br />
# for OpenVPN to draw client addresses from.<br />
# The server will take 10.8.0.1 for itself,<br />
server 10.0.8.0 255.255.255.0<br />
<br />
# ...if a connecting client has a private<br />
# subnet behind it that should also have VPN access,<br />
# use the subdirectory "ccd" for client-specific<br />
# configuration files and the route command to<br />
# specify the specific IP(s) or connected networks.<br />
<br />
# route used with net30 topology<br />
route 10.0.55.0 255.255.255.0<br />
<br />
# route used with subnet topology<br />
route 10.0.55.0 255.255.255.0 10.0.8.1<br />
</blockquote><br />
<br />
 
            </div>
        </content>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <link href="http://none.of-the-above.com/archives/274-fruity-networking.html" rel="alternate" title="fruity networking" />
        <author>
            <name>ra</name>
                    </author>
    
        <published>2009-01-19T17:58:00Z</published>
        <updated>2009-01-19T17:58:00Z</updated>
        <wfw:comment>http://none.of-the-above.com/wfwcomment.php?cid=274</wfw:comment>
    
        <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
        <wfw:commentRss>http://none.of-the-above.com/rss.php?version=atom1.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=274</wfw:commentRss>
    
    
        <id>http://none.of-the-above.com/archives/274-guid.html</id>
        <title type="html">fruity networking</title>
        <content type="xhtml" xml:base="http://none.of-the-above.com/">
            <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                Although my personal exposure to Apple products has been somewhat limited (mostly an originally blueberry iMac running OS 10.3 that I play around with... seriously), I have plenty of experience helping other people with their Macs or Apple gear. The times I've spent with Apple desktops and laptops has been enjoyable, but as for Apple networking equipment (Airport express, Airport Extreme, etc) i would have to rate these experiences at the opposite end of the pleasure spectrum. Somewhere near "pound my bloody head on the desk over and over".<br />
<br />
Specifically, I would like to know what fruit-loop at Apple decided that CLI and web-interfaces were too passé, so they needed a closed configuration interface that requires a binary application running on a Mac or Windows computer to do anything at all with the device*. If they were trying to say "Dear users of Linux and other lesser OS's: FUCK YOU", well I got the message. Thanks. The last general networked device I encountered that was so retarded that it's main configuration method was proprietary software running on another device was a stupid print server.... from NINETEEN FUCKING NINETY-FIVE. However, at least that device could still be mostly configured using Telnet!! Not so for POS Apple networking gear.<br />
<br />
Yesterday I discovered that the Apple Airport Extreme wireless router does not support static routes. Seriously, even if this <em>was</em> a seldom used feature for most users, how fucking hard is it to include it when you're putting together a router anyway. Besides which I can't even remember the last time I encountered a POS off-the-shelf Linksys or whatever router that didn't have static routes. So again, Apple is apparently competing with low-end networking gear from the 1990's??<br />
<br />
Here's another added bonus: changing anything as trivial as a firewall rule reboots the router. Again, all but the shittiest routers I can think of can apply firewall rules and many other config changes without rebooting the whole router. This is absolutely pathetic for hardware that costs as much as Apple's shit does.<br />
<br />
Between the hell I went through trying to configure a couple of Airport Expresses using their awful software and the new knowledge that Apple routers can't even do static routes, you can bet I'll be recommending Apple networking gear precisely NEVER. I wouldn't want someone to buy one only to find out it also doesn't support... I don't know, DHCP? DNS? Who the fuck needs that anyway, right? We'll just all say Bonjour and Rendezvous over at .local.<br />
<br />
Fuck you, Apple.<br />
<br />
* Yes, I know there are some open-source tools painstakingly constructed by sniffing traffic from Apple's software, but they aren't fully-featured and don't work with all devices, and that only supports my point. 
            </div>
        </content>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <link href="http://none.of-the-above.com/archives/271-yea-NF!.html" rel="alternate" title="yea NF!" />
        <author>
            <name>ra</name>
                    </author>
    
        <published>2008-07-04T00:21:57Z</published>
        <updated>2008-07-04T00:21:57Z</updated>
        <wfw:comment>http://none.of-the-above.com/wfwcomment.php?cid=271</wfw:comment>
    
        <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
        <wfw:commentRss>http://none.of-the-above.com/rss.php?version=atom1.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=271</wfw:commentRss>
    
    
        <id>http://none.of-the-above.com/archives/271-guid.html</id>
        <title type="html">yea NF!</title>
        <content type="xhtml" xml:base="http://none.of-the-above.com/">
            <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                So Netflix and a clue went out on a date... and she won them over! Yea!<br />
<br />
Yeah, profiles are staying and I resumed our subscription. 
            </div>
        </content>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <link href="http://none.of-the-above.com/archives/270-Letter-to-netflix.html" rel="alternate" title="Letter to netflix" />
        <author>
            <name>ra</name>
                    </author>
    
        <published>2008-06-20T01:04:00Z</published>
        <updated>2008-06-19T14:41:01Z</updated>
        <wfw:comment>http://none.of-the-above.com/wfwcomment.php?cid=270</wfw:comment>
    
        <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
        <wfw:commentRss>http://none.of-the-above.com/rss.php?version=atom1.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=270</wfw:commentRss>
    
            <category scheme="http://none.of-the-above.com/categories/2-rants" label="rants" term="rants" />
    
        <id>http://none.of-the-above.com/archives/270-guid.html</id>
        <title type="html">Letter to netflix</title>
        <content type="xhtml" xml:base="http://none.of-the-above.com/">
            <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                to: publicrelations@netflix.com<br />
cc: lkilgore@netflix.com<br />
cc: reed.hastings@netflix.com<br />
subject: Netflix profiles feature<br />
<br />
To whom it may concern:<br />
<br />
As a direct result of the email I received from Netflix last night regarding the elimination of the profiles feature, I have just placed my Netflix account On Hold.<br />
<br />
For us, profiles are the most important feature differentiating Netflix from its competitors like Blockbuster Online. Profiles are integral to our Netflix experience. We are not interested in trying to merge queues or manage reviews and recommendations for three different people on a single profile/account.<br />
<br />
My subscription is currently set to resume on 07 September 2008, but rest assured that if profiles disappear on 01 September I will instead cancel my subscription outright. 
            </div>
        </content>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <link href="http://none.of-the-above.com/archives/269-pissing-me-the-FUCK-off.html" rel="alternate" title="pissing me the FUCK off" />
        <author>
            <name>ra</name>
                    </author>
    
        <published>2008-06-19T02:33:18Z</published>
        <updated>2008-06-19T14:41:15Z</updated>
        <wfw:comment>http://none.of-the-above.com/wfwcomment.php?cid=269</wfw:comment>
    
        <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
        <wfw:commentRss>http://none.of-the-above.com/rss.php?version=atom1.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=269</wfw:commentRss>
    
            <category scheme="http://none.of-the-above.com/categories/2-rants" label="rants" term="rants" />
    
        <id>http://none.of-the-above.com/archives/269-guid.html</id>
        <title type="html">pissing me the FUCK off</title>
        <content type="xhtml" xml:base="http://none.of-the-above.com/">
            <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                What a lovely evening.<br />
<br />
First of all, around midnight tonight some fucker rings our doorbell and runs off.<br />
Great. So now I get to wonder whether it was just punk kids, or someone checking to see if anybody was home so they could rob the place. I might not be as concerned if someone hadn't rang the bell earlier today as well. I didn't answer it then because I was busy and I wasn't expecting anyone. But I can't help but wonder if someone was canvassing the neighborhood looking for unoccupied houses to return to at night.<br />
<br />
Then, when I come back inside I'm greeted by an email from Netflix that says they are removing profiles. WTF. Their profiles are in my opinion one of their best features. We have three profiles on our account. Their email tells me they are eliminating profiles to "help [them] continue to improve" their site. If this is a taste of "improvements" to come then I guess it's about time to "upgrade" my Netflix account... to the ZERO discs plan. I'm canning their asses to let them know what I think.<br />
<br />
GRRRRR. FUCK. THAT IS ALL. 
            </div>
        </content>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <link href="http://none.of-the-above.com/archives/267-broken-cables,-leaky-switches.html" rel="alternate" title="broken cables, leaky switches" />
        <author>
            <name>ra</name>
                    </author>
    
        <published>2008-05-02T22:52:00Z</published>
        <updated>2008-06-19T14:41:36Z</updated>
        <wfw:comment>http://none.of-the-above.com/wfwcomment.php?cid=267</wfw:comment>
    
        <slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
        <wfw:commentRss>http://none.of-the-above.com/rss.php?version=atom1.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=267</wfw:commentRss>
    
            <category scheme="http://none.of-the-above.com/categories/16-computerish" label="computerish" term="computerish" />
    
        <id>http://none.of-the-above.com/archives/267-guid.html</id>
        <title type="html">broken cables, leaky switches</title>
        <content type="xhtml" xml:base="http://none.of-the-above.com/">
            <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                I had one hell of a networking problem crop up at a client the other day. I was called in to troubleshoot an odd problem where some machines suddenly could not get to the internet... sometimes.<br />
<br />
Damn I just LOVE problems that start like this. I poked around and checked their router and rebooted their shittier-than-turds Dell VLAN switches and came up with nothing.<br />
<br />
The router has several interfaces and the only ones being affected where those which have VLAN's on them, so I was fairly suspicious of those Dell switches since they've given me trouble with VLAN's before, but the symptoms here were downright bizarre.<br />
<br />
I did some packet monitoring and some other experimentation and came up with the following observations:<br />
<br />
- Local internetwork traffic is mostly passed just fine (there was one case where we saw some packet loss from one VLAN subnet to another but it could have been a fluke)<br />
- From the affected machines, Internet bound traffic goes in the switch and never comes out-- doesn't even make it to the router.<br />
- Moving devices from one switch port to another would sometimes make them work--or if they were working, fail to work. But the problem was never static across any given ports.<br />
<br />
After several hours of troubleshooting and headscratching, I had but one pathetically weak theory. I knew that new device had been connected to the network, and we eventually found that after unplugging this device, the problem seemed to gradually clear up, however plugging the device in did not reintroduce the problem, at least not within a reasonable period of time. The new device was connected across a hallway using a patch cable that was getting walked on. The cable under the hallway rug was stupid yes, but I didn't immediately associate it with this strange network-wide problem, but that became my main hypothesis, because everything else had been eliminated.<br />
<br />
So we tested it. We went and started jumping up and down on the cable and sure enough, some of the machines on the network lost Internet connectivity. And unplugging the cable and rebooting the switches restored it.<br />
<br />
So there you have it. Bad patch cables can seriously fuck up your network, especially if you're using Dell switches. But wait, how does one broken cable connected from a switch to just one device cause only certain packets with certain destinations to disappear? I HAVE NO FUCKING CLUE! 
            </div>
        </content>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <link href="http://none.of-the-above.com/archives/266-more-than-a-phone.html" rel="alternate" title="more than a phone" />
        <author>
            <name>ra</name>
                    </author>
    
        <published>2008-04-29T21:44:12Z</published>
        <updated>2008-06-19T14:41:57Z</updated>
        <wfw:comment>http://none.of-the-above.com/wfwcomment.php?cid=266</wfw:comment>
    
        <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
        <wfw:commentRss>http://none.of-the-above.com/rss.php?version=atom1.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=266</wfw:commentRss>
    
            <category scheme="http://none.of-the-above.com/categories/14-gadgets-and-phones" label="gadgets and phones" term="gadgets and phones" />
    
        <id>http://none.of-the-above.com/archives/266-guid.html</id>
        <title type="html">more than a phone</title>
        <content type="xhtml" xml:base="http://none.of-the-above.com/">
            <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                I've come to rely on my phone for much more than just calls. It is my morning alarm clock. I take pictures with it all the time. It is my wristwatch and calendar. It is my modem when I have no ethernet/wifi.<br />
<br />
So that I am still carrying an original RAZR makes me feel just a bit crippled. I do get along OK with it, but the VGA camera is killing me, the lack of even EDGE for data use sucks, and bluetooth on this thing drives me fucking nuts (want to use bluetooth headset? might as well reboot first since 4/5 times it won't work otherwise. Want to send 20 pics via bluetooth? You have to select the recipient device before sending each one --UGH). So I'm thinking it's time for a new phone.<br />
<br />
I had been kicking around the idea of a smartphone for a while but I've been really unexcited by everything out there. I've defiantly kept my PDA (Palm TX) and phone separate all this time but I think I'm prepared to relent, if I can only find the right device. The truth is my Palm is dying. Maybe it has cancer of the touchscreen, I don't know; but what's clear is that it is getting less reliable and less usable all the time. On the bottom half of the screen, my pen touches register about 1 mm above or below where they really are. This throws off my graffiti at times, and makes using the onscreen keyboard nigh-impossible. Then there are the crashes. I didn't used to experience them much, but now they happen all the time. Blazer is the biggest culprit but earlier I simply ticked an option in the system prefs and it abruptly reset on me.<br />
<br />
My mind made up, now I just need to find this mythical device that will combine and improve upon the capabilities of my RAZR and TX.<br />
<br />
Uh oh. It doesn't seem to exist. I wouldn't consider windows mobile anything unless I were to first get a lobotomy, so that's out. I want to like the Treos, but this is 2008 and I can't bring myself to buy a NEW phone running Palm OS 5. The iPhone is cool, but is more or less incompatible with my Linux desktop/PIM. Anything else I've found (which isn't much) just doesn't move me. At this point I think there is only one hope.<br />
<br />
Android. I am watching and waiting, with great anticipation, for the first Android-powered phones. I don't know if they will fulfill my every desire, but they certainly have the most potential, and I really hope they live up to the hype because they are pretty much my last hope. 
            </div>
        </content>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <link href="http://none.of-the-above.com/archives/265-SOIP.html" rel="alternate" title="SOIP" />
        <author>
            <name>ra</name>
                    </author>
    
        <published>2008-04-22T01:24:00Z</published>
        <updated>2008-04-21T00:03:23Z</updated>
        <wfw:comment>http://none.of-the-above.com/wfwcomment.php?cid=265</wfw:comment>
    
        <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
        <wfw:commentRss>http://none.of-the-above.com/rss.php?version=atom1.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=265</wfw:commentRss>
    
            <category scheme="http://none.of-the-above.com/categories/16-computerish" label="computerish" term="computerish" />
    
        <id>http://none.of-the-above.com/archives/265-guid.html</id>
        <title type="html">SOIP</title>
        <content type="xhtml" xml:base="http://none.of-the-above.com/">
            <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                Kind of like VOIP, but the voice is mostly replaced by silence.<br />
<br />
I put together my awesome Asterisk server last year, bought five SIP phones on ebay, and was ready to rock. I guess I was thinking "if you build it, they will call" but it's been a bit lamer than that.<br />
<br />
It's not all bad though. Despite that hardly anyone dials our VOIP number because they already have our cell numbers, it's nice to have for emergencies if teh cell network is doing the suckage, or battery is dead, etc. Most of our calls are internal (call downstairs from the bedroom, etc), which is certainly convenient, even if it seems a bit silly at times.<br />
<br />
I have been racking up some minutes on my home-office VOIP line however, which rings only at my desk and the softphone on my laptop, so I don't feel that my PBX is not going to waste, even if it is underutilized.<br />
<br />
I still need to finish hacking my PAP2 ATA (ugh., still haven't broken in) and I'm going to play with conference calling when I get a chance, and oops-- I still need to arrange to test 911 dialing; but in the mean time my little Asterisk server is doing everything I need and much, much more. 
            </div>
        </content>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <link href="http://none.of-the-above.com/archives/264-license-to-route.html" rel="alternate" title="license to route" />
        <author>
            <name>ra</name>
                    </author>
    
        <published>2008-04-17T00:35:34Z</published>
        <updated>2008-04-21T00:08:54Z</updated>
        <wfw:comment>http://none.of-the-above.com/wfwcomment.php?cid=264</wfw:comment>
    
        <slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
        <wfw:commentRss>http://none.of-the-above.com/rss.php?version=atom1.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=264</wfw:commentRss>
    
            <category scheme="http://none.of-the-above.com/categories/16-computerish" label="computerish" term="computerish" />
    
        <id>http://none.of-the-above.com/archives/264-guid.html</id>
        <title type="html">license to route</title>
        <content type="xhtml" xml:base="http://none.of-the-above.com/">
            <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                OK, I'm back and I'm going to try not to let my blog rot, like almost EVERYONE else's I know...<br />
<br />
Recently I've had a awful pain in my side, and it turned out to be a pointy Cisco license restriction.<br />
<br />
<!-- s9ymdb:51 --><img width="107" height="100" style="float: left; border: 0px; padding-left: 5px; padding-right: 5px;" src="http://none.of-the-above.com/uploads/media/router.jpg" alt="" />It started with sporadic trouble at the client as they began to use their VPN's more heavily. They had purchased a Cisco ASA 5505 to use as their VPN router, on my recommendation, and everything had been fine until we added another IPSEC tunnel and had more people accessing the remote sites. After some experimentation, we found the magic number to be 10 users, after which no one else could connect to anything across the VPN's.<br />
<br />
Whoa... that sounds just like the "user" limit on this device! I hate user limits. Artificial restrictions on the capability of some hardware tends to piss me off. But I digress... This user limit restriction was a complete surprise because although we purchased a "10 user" ASA, I had talked to two different Cisco reps before the purchase to clarify the meaning of this and had been assured that this "user" limit did not pertain to users/IP's connecting over the IPSEC tunnels, and we didn't care about anything else as this device is strictly a VPN-gateway--they already have a m0n0wall in use as their primary internet gateway router.<br />
<br />
So, Cisco screwed up. Fortunately I am a digital pack-rat and could produce a year-old email proving that the rep told me that the "user" limit meant 10 IPSEC tunnels with no limit on number of users. The truth is that there were two limits: 10 tunnels AND 10 users/IP's. Unfortunately, it took about two and a half weeks of dealing with assorted Cisco people to finally get a resolution, in the form of a free unlimited user license upgrade.<br />
<br />
The outcome is satisfactory, but it really pisses me off that I had to waste so much time troubleshooting and getting it resolved after I tried hard to avoid this very problem by contacting them before buying. Furthermore, based on my conversations with half a dozen Cisco employees I can say that most of them didn't really understand the licensing terms of their own product, which is pretty sad. How am I supposed to understand if they don't? The less clear the license terms, the more likely that someone is going to get surprised by some restriction at the worst possible moment, and then swear off ever buying that brand again. 
            </div>
        </content>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <link href="http://none.of-the-above.com/archives/258-oh-neglected-blog.html" rel="alternate" title="oh neglected blog" />
        <author>
            <name>ra</name>
                    </author>
    
        <published>2007-12-20T19:50:00Z</published>
        <updated>2007-12-20T20:23:18Z</updated>
        <wfw:comment>http://none.of-the-above.com/wfwcomment.php?cid=258</wfw:comment>
    
        <slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
        <wfw:commentRss>http://none.of-the-above.com/rss.php?version=atom1.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=258</wfw:commentRss>
    
    
        <id>http://none.of-the-above.com/archives/258-guid.html</id>
        <title type="html">oh neglected blog</title>
        <content type="xhtml" xml:base="http://none.of-the-above.com/">
            <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                I've been super busy with various projects and crap for... a long while, but I'll summarize what I've been doing while I've been not blogging.<br />
<br />
- Laid 46 sq meters (500 sq ft) of laminant flooring from Ikea in the living room, dining room and hallway.<br />
<br />
- Installed (with help) new pre-hung front door. Looks MUCH nicer than the old, plain, crappy steel door we had. And, I installed a door bell! Our house didn't have one before for some inexplicable reason.<br />
<br />
- Went to <a href="http://ohiolinux.org/">Ohio LinuxFest 2007</a> in September. My first time; it was very cool. My favorite talk was an intro to Python by <a href="http://catherinedevlin.blogspot.com/">Catherine Devlin</a>.<br />
<br />
- Setup a MythTV box, put in a bluetooth receiver and configured our Wiimotes to act as input devices for the system so they can navigate the Myth frontend. Still working on this as the box is starved for memory and I drop lots of frames if I try to watch HD (broadcast only, we don't have cable tv), but the system is quite usable. I recorded/watched some cool programs on PBS not long ago.<br />
<br />
- Setup an Asterisk server, bought a few IP phones and an ATA and got cheap VOIP service. I tried out Trixbox initially (well, for about an hour), but I didn't like being insulated from the guts of the config so I just went with a Xubuntu server running regular Asterisk instead. I learned a lot more that way; configuring SIP, custom dialplans, voicemail, etc.<br />
<br />
- Tore a hole in the wall between dining room and front room and put in a new doorway. Destruction with a sledgehammer: FUN! Drywall/plaster work: eh, not so fun. Also a lot of electrical work there, as I had to move wires for two circuits. This is almost finished, pending final coat of plaster and then paint.<br />
<br />
- And most recently... I obviously got a new domain name for my blog!<br />
<br />
Those are the highlights anyway. I'll soon share more details about various sub-projects and stuff. 
            </div>
        </content>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <link href="http://none.of-the-above.com/archives/256-and-so-they-did.html" rel="alternate" title="and so they did" />
        <author>
            <name>ra</name>
                    </author>
    
        <published>2007-09-05T00:45:00Z</published>
        <updated>2007-09-05T11:25:43Z</updated>
        <wfw:comment>http://none.of-the-above.com/wfwcomment.php?cid=256</wfw:comment>
    
        <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
        <wfw:commentRss>http://none.of-the-above.com/rss.php?version=atom1.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=256</wfw:commentRss>
    
    
        <id>http://none.of-the-above.com/archives/256-guid.html</id>
        <title type="html">and so they did</title>
        <content type="xhtml" xml:base="http://none.of-the-above.com/">
            <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                It looks like someone at Palm was listening, and they've managed to hear AND respond to the lackluster response (<a href="http://none.sunmine.net/s9y/archives/247-fold-it-up.html" >like my own</a>) to the Foleo announcement. Yup, <a href="http://blog.palm.com/palm/2007/09/a-message-to-pa.html" >the Foleo's been folded up</a>. Canceling it flashes  a glimmer of hope in my mind, that Palm may just be able to turn things around and get some positive momentum going. I would say it all hinges on their next Treo/smartphone-by-any-other-name offering. 
            </div>
        </content>
        
    </entry>

</feed>